Find it in the Online Newstand!
Democrats are whiners, period. You know it's true because the hire professional protesters. These so-called activists and protesters complain about every little thing and it's been compounded because they don't like the man sitting in the White House.
Wouldn't it be nice, if these whiners and professional protesters were to put their political 'energy' into bettering themselves and their communities, rather than 'demand' the government do that for them?
There's that saying from poet John Lydgate, later adapted by President Lincoln:
“You can please some of the people all of the time, you can please all of the people some of the time, but you can’t please all of the people all of the time.”
And here's that saying from Mike Thayer: "Get back to real life you whiny protesters!"
Follow the money: The REAL reason Democrats are up in arms about Iowa's Collective Bargaining Agreement
Elected Democrats are upset that a Republican bill to change how collective bargaining for public sector employees happens is going to pass.
Why are the liberal heads upset? Because a change to the current way collective bargaining is done for public sector employees in the state of Iowa will mean a big drop in political contributions to those elected officials. Unions tend (more like always) to back Democrat candidates. And if this bill gets signed into law by Governor Branstad - and it looks like it will - Unions won't be able to bully workers into paying for political agendas like they used to.
Republicans are pushing a bill that changes the current collective bargaining rules for 'public sector', a.k.a. government workers in the state of Iowa. First and foremost, the bill eliminates the longtime practice of gathering union dues through payroll deductions (mandatory in a union shop). That's a big deal to both sides.
For Democrats it means their faucet flow of automatic political campaign contributions is going to be restricted moving forward. What used to be mandatory unions dues taken through payroll deductions - automatic cash flow for union/political agendas - will now be voluntary for employees. Moving forward, employees will decide how/if they will pay union dues, it won't be forced on them, what a novel idea! Don't believe the Democrat claims that this is somehow about how the new rules 'hurt' middle class jobs and wages..... Make no mistake, this is REALLY about Democrats being upset about their political cash flow. The liberal-minded claims that this bill hurts the middle class, that this bill somehow hurts the children (in the case of teacher's unions), or that this bill will somehow adversely effect public safety are completely bogus!
For Republicans, this new rule also means a reduction in Democrat cash flow...... It's easier to run a political campaign when you know the opposition isn't so flush with cash. So do you believe the Republican claims that current collective bargaining rules are not fair to Iowa taxpayers, that they don't have a voice when it comes to having a presence at the collective bargaining table? That argument has merit, under current collective bargaining rules, no, Joe Taxpayer doesn't really have a voice at the table, it's government head vs. union head..... That's a no-win situation for the average taxpayer..... But do know what the true motivating base factor is in this legislation, for BOTH sides.... It's about the political cash flow.
In addition to putting a stop to mandatory union dues collections through payroll deduction, the bill also alters how unions are certified. Unions will now have to be re-certified prior to each new contract negotiation. Long term, this puts more power back into the hands of employees, rather than union heads. Democrats don't like that. If employees choose not to belong to the union, the union loses power and influence politically...... The union, the political agenda, the politicians, lose cash flow.
The bill also changes arbitration rules. Unions involved in public safety will sustain current law, to be able to bargain for not only base wages, but for insurance, hours, vacations, holidays, overtime compensation and health/safety concerns as well. Why public safety gets a pass is illogical, one would think there should be consistency in rules for all public sector unions..... Chalk that one up to political gaming.... For non public safety unions, they will be able to bargain for base wages, but issues such as insurance, hours, vacations, holidays, etc., must be agreed upon before bargaining can begin. That just makes sense. Both sides know what the agenda is, before negotiations begin.
With just about anything political, it's really about the money, NOT what politicians are telling you in window dressing fashion......
So in the latest cold spell we had, my truck battery died. It could no longer drum up the power to crank the engine. May it rest in peace......
It's been quite awhile since I've had to buy a battery for a vehicle, so I wasn't quite sure what to expect when it came to prices.....
HOLY CRAP Battery Man!
For my vehicle, in a cold-weather climate and needing 850 cold cranking amps..... Here are the prices of the leading battery providers:
O'Reilly Auto Parts: $134
Sure, Interstate is perhaps the most well known, considered the top of the line, but is it? Really? Is Interstate's 850 cold crank amp battery really any better than anybody else's, or is it just marketing? And then you get the two most popular auto parts stores and their respective offerings.... Gosh, can you tell there is competitive pricing there?
The price for Walmart's Everstart 65 Maxx, with 850 cold cranking amps, is $95. It's got a 5 year warranty, just like all the others.
If you are going to install a battery yourself, this is a no brainer. Walmart is the way to go. And here's something you may not know..... Take your old battery into the store when buying a new one, it saves you about $18 in a "core fee". If you turn in your old battery, you won't get charged.
And if you do decide to have a service center install a battery for you, make sure they don't charge you a "core fee." They took out the old battery and kept it. They didn't ask you if you wanted to keep it, they didn't put it in your trunk, so don't let them charge you that fee.
There's been a lot of talk lately about whether or not there should be a law banishing the burning of the U.S. flag. The main arguments are these: (burn yes) Flag burning is free speech... (burn no) If you don't love the land of the free then why are you even here?
My take: No, there shouldn't be any legislation banning the burning of the U.S. flag, it is in fact, an expression of free speech like it or not. But if somebody beats the crap out of a flag burner, well I sure as hell didn't see it and neither should law enforcement..... For every action, there is a reaction. Actions have consequences folks and you really need to think things through before doing something completely hypocritical. Burning the U.S. flag is the epitome of carrying out an act in total conflict with the freedom to do so.
Dear Council member Kingsley-Botchway and School Board member DeLoach,
Your stance on police presence in our community schools is bullshit.
There is no other way to describe it. The words 'completely unreasonable' first came to mind, but it's beyond that.
Area police departments are wanting dialog and positive interaction to alleviate fears, to eliminate stereotyping, to DEVELOP community relations and what do you do? Unreasonably poo-poo those efforts. Making matters worse, it seems you've based your stance on the very false premise that men and women in a police uniform are inherently evil. You've insulted every hard working law enforcement officer out there busting their proverbial butts to serve the area's metro community.
You are public officials. Shame on you for calling police uniforms offensive, for questioning police presence in schools for some un-vetted fear that somebody had a bad experience. More importantly, shame on you for apparently not even looking to the students themselves for the positives in these outreach programs before putting your knee-jerk reactions on public display.
Let me sum this up with a question: Banning a positive is your answer to developing relationships?
Again, that's bullshit.
Publisher, Coralville Courier
All these various state legislators trying to create new hate crime laws..... STOP IT! i.e., shooting a cop is a hate crime, killing a person based on race is a hate crime, beating up a gay person is a hate crime..... NO! Murder is murder, rape is rape, a gun crime is a gun crime, assault is assault. Quit trying to put emotion into it! Our obligation is to police crimes committed, not police social ills. If anything needs to be changed, it's sentencing, but let's not 'create' new laws needing to be enforced and prosecuted. AS IF law enforcement and our courts don't already have enough on their proverbial plates?
It's early yet regarding the effects of the county penalizing businesses and consumers with their artificial inflation shenanigans, but to consider: The average monthly rate of unemployment in Johnson County in 2015 according to Iowa Workforce Development statistics was 2.6%. That's great and a pretty darn low rate right!? And sure, there are tangibles besides a minimum wage hike that can effect an unemployment rate, this area is after all pretty much a state taxpayer run economy.... But again, consider this: The average monthly rate of unemployment in Johnson County so far in 2016 is 2.9%, after the county government forced wage hike to $8.20/hr on Nov. 1, 2015. We have yet to feel the repercussions of the "You MUST pay!" $9.15/hr on May 1, 2016, but given the data history of cities like Seattle that have enacted government-forced wage hikes, it will mean another increase in the jobless rate. And never mind the rise in area prices for consumer goods....... That cup of coffee from the non-chain establishment, that breakfast at your favorite LOCAL eatery, that trinket or knickknack at the Mom & Pop shop. Don't worry, if you haven't already experienced a price hike or two, you will, and then-some.
"But, wait a minute!" you say.
"Isn't that unemployment rate going the wrong way?"
"But, but, supervisors said the opposite would happen!"
Yep, all true.
Things that make you go hmmmmm......... And see, I told you so......
This story is developing.... Like I said, it's early in the government-telling-local-businesses-how-to-pay-wages game. But remember, county supervisors like Rod Sullivan PROMISED us that more jobs would be created with a forced wage hike. He PROMISED us that artificially inflating pay would mean increased buying power. He PROMISED us that government telling businesses how to go about their business would stimulate the local economy.
So far, that hasn't been the case.
Stay tuned, more monthly unemployment rate information is pending, along with consumer price data!
Pssst, hey Rod, government forced higher minimum wage increases cause unemployment. They also cause UNDER-employment, which is many ways, is an even worse thing. You're not fixing anything, you're actually making matters worse.
By Mike Thayer
Donald Trump is Michael Bloomberg on an national scale and that's dangerous. The "R" next to his name is calculated, not valued. We aren't just facing higher taxes, salt taken off restaurant tables or bans on fountain pop over 16 ounces, we're looking at much worse. Some people need to realize just how liberal a Trump presidency would be. All they have to do is look at his record. The argument that we get Hillary if we don't support Trump is a hollow one, as they are essentially one in the same.
Are you worried about low information voters? How about the voters that embrace Donald Trump's manipulations of the issues and even repeat/perpetuate those falsehoods as if they were fact? For people who not-so-long ago claimed to be so frustrated with the many games establishment politicians play, they sure are looking the other way when The Donald plays them.
There's an extreme level of voter ignorance out there, much of it willful. Many of these supporters of Trump have claimed to be conservative, yet they promote Trump in a very liberal, progressive manner, to include aggressive/personal attack style attempts to censor or squash anything negative about their candidate. Reality be damned.
If you see a double standard, you are correct. For example when Donald Trump abused eminent domain in the mid-1990's, seizing the property of homeowners to build parking garages and casinos, these so-called conservatives said, "That's not right, he shouldn't be able to do that." And now? They say Trump is a "successful businessman." When The Donald publicly supported universal health care in 2000, these so-called conservatives rejected Trump's stance with vigor. These same people now say Trump's plan for health care is a good one. Never mind he hasn't really stated one. When Trump said he would order members of our military to kill the family members of terrorists, his supporters pretended not to hear it. If any other candidate would have said such a thing, they would have cried foul! Trump was for the H1-B immigration visa program before he was against it, John Kerry style. Kerry was chastised by these Trump supporters for flip-flopping, but when it comes to Trump?... Flip-flop? What flip-flop? In September of 2015, Trump said the United States should accept refugees from Syria. But when his stance started to catch flak with real conservatives and his polling numbers started to drop, Trump changed his tune. Suddenly, he was against accepting Syrian refugees....... Ah, the stuff of establishment politicians! But do Trump supporters care? Apparently not!
Exercising a double standard, this is what liberals do, what the left does, how progressives operate - they ignore reality. What was once something objected to, is now - by Trump supporters - embraced. To these people, it doesn't matter what Donald Trump says or does, they defend him no matter what. Ladies and gentlemen, that's what liberals do, what the left does, how progressives operate.
You have to wonder what these people are drinking. Conservative principles were tossed aside as they jumped on the Trump bandwagon. On nearly every issue, Trump supporters exercise a liberal double standard. It's intellectual dishonesty, it's an abandonment of conservative values, it's shameful.